Background Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains one of the most challenging lesion subsets in interventional cardiology, even with the development of medical device and operator expertise. This study was conducted to examine the relationship between lesion characteristics and procedural success and the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO.
Methods Clinical and coronary angiographic data of 1263 patients with CTO who underwent PCI between June 1995 and December 2005 in Shenyang General Hospital of PLA were retrospectively analyzed. Results There were 1625 CTO lesions located in 1596 vessels with a mean occlusion time of 48.9 months. A total of 1647 coronary stents were implanted to the target lesions. The overall patient and lesion success rates were 90.8 % (1147/1263) and 88.9 % (1445/1625), respectively. The success rate of PCI was declined with long duration of occlusion, abrupt missing stump, bridging collaterals ≥15 mm in occluded length, moderate to severe calcification or tortuosity and ostial or distal location of CTO lesions (P〈 0.05). Procedural failure occurred in 116 patients, caused by impossibility of guide-wire (81.0%) or balloon (19.0%) to pass through the occlusion. There was no death during procedure, but 2 patients suffered from acute stent thrombosis and other 9 patients had acute or late pericardial perforation. Those complications were all successfully treated. After procedure, 3 patients died, 4 experienced urgent target vessel revascularization because of subacute stent thrombosis and 1 underwent coronary bypass graft surgery due to coronary ftstula during in-hospital period. The overall in-hospital MACE rate was 0.6% (8/1263). Drug-eluting stents were used in 198 patients without in-hospital MACE.
Conclusions In an experienced heart center, it is possible to obtain a relatively high success rate of PCI and favorable clinical outcomes for patients with coronary CTO lesions. 相似文献
Background Some larger scale, randomized studies have demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate the impact of DES, in comparison with BMS, on the 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods From January 2002 to December 2008, a total of 1301 consecutive STEMI patients treated with coronary stenting in Shenyang Northern Hospital were prospectively registered. Patients received BMS (n=868) or DES (n=435) implantation in the infarction related artery according to physician’s discretion. A propensity score analysis was performed and two well matched subgroups were selected (BMS, n=288; DES, n=288) to evaluate the 2-year clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR).
Results Survival salvage analysis showed that 2-year cumulative hazards were not significantly different between the two groups with respect to TVR (2.8% vs. 3.1%, log-rank P=0.780), stent thrombosis (1.7% vs. 4.2%, log-rank P=0.079) and MACE (8% vs. 10.8%, log-rank P=0.236). Multivariate analysis showed that DES was an independent protective factor of MI (HR: 0.211, 95% CI: 0.049 to 0.908) and stent thrombosis (HR: 0.327, 95% CI: 0.107 to 0.994).
Conclusion DES was associated with similar 2-year clinical outcomes to those of BMS for the treatment of STEMI in daily practice.
Background Endovascular stent-graff treatment has emerged as an alternative for patients with type B aortic dissection (AD), either at acute or chronic phase, in selected patients. This study aimed to investigate the results of endovascular stent-graft repair for acute and chronic type BAD. Methods From May 2002 to July 2007, 67 patients with type BAD were treated by endovascular stent-graft placement. There were 32 patients in the acute phase (AAD group) and 35 patients in the chronic phase (CAD group). The patients were followed up from 1 to 65 months (average, 17_+16 months). The immediate and follow-up clinical outcomes were documented and compared between the 2 groups. Results Placement of endovascular stent-grafts across the primary entry tears was technically successful in all 67 patients. Compared with patients in the CAD group, those in the AAD group had higher percentages of pleural effusion (15.6% vs 0, P=-0.02) and visceral/leg ischemia (21.9% vs 2.9%, P=0.02). Procedure related complications, including endoleak and post-implantation syndrome occurred more frequently in AAD group than in CAD group (21.9% vs 2.9% and 31.3% vs 8.6%, respectively; P=0.02 and P=0.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in survival rate at 4 years between the 2 groups (86.4% vs 92.3%, P=0.42 by Log-rank test). But the 4-year event-free survival rate was higher in patients with chronic dissection than in patients with acute dissection (96.2% vs 73.9%; P=0.02 by Log-rank test). Conclusions Endovascular repair with stent-graff was safe and effective for the treatment of both acute and chronic type BAD. However, both immediate and long term major complications occurred more frequently in patients with acute dissection than in those with chronic dissection. 相似文献